Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

How does Dr. Carey define leadership

1. How does Dr. Carey define leadership?

2. Draw and label Blake & Mouton’s Managerial Grid. Label where you were when you started MGMT 4010 with an “S” and where you were when the course ended with an “E”.

What influenced you to move from the start of the course to where you were at the end of the course?

3. What’s more important, task or people?

Circle only one: TASK PEOPLE

And explain why:

4. Describe your task (goal) orientation:

5. Describe your people orientation:

6. How did you motivate your associates: intrinsically and extrinsically?

Which is best, why?

7. What do you recommend to improve the MGMT 4010 class and/or the project team experience?

11.

THE FEDERAL COURTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES
Assignment #3: THE FEDERAL COURTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES
I. Options

For this assignment you may examine any Supreme Court decision concerning one of the first ten amendments. You may use a case on the provided list of cases below or you may also find your own case. However, it is a very good idea to check the case with the Instructor before beginning if the case was not on the provided list. Many cases sound like they are relevant to the first ten amendments, but are not actually decided on these topics.
II. Task:

Court Decision: You may use any case search site or general search site (a couple case search sites are available on the Canvas site with the assignment). You must find any case that deals with one of the first ten amendments. You should look at both recent cases and older cases. Some of the older cases are more interesting as they argue positions that have been overturned since then and you can see the different way the same issue may be interpreted by different courts. Most cases may be found by searching by topic or the amendment number; for example, “first amendment Supreme Court cases,” or “search and seizure Supreme Court cases.” Most case search sites will find the case by listing a party in the case. For example, the case Miranda v. Arizona may be found by typing “Miranda” into the search. Please ask for help if you have any difficulty.
III. Requirements:

Court Decision: Select any Supreme Court Case concerning one of the first ten amendments. Write a 3-5 page essay-styled paper discussing the case and the Court’s opinion. The paper must be double-spaced, 10-12 font, and 1-inch margins. AVOID CUTTING AND PASTING AT ALL COSTS. The paper must be in your words and NOT a copy of the Court decision. At a minimum, a paper receiving a 70% MUST fulfill format requirements and address the following questions:

What is the case and the relevant amendment?

*What are the background details of the case (who, what, where … info)?

*What did the Court decide, WHY, and who wrote the opinions?

Were there any concurring or dissenting opinions and who wrote them?

Do you agree with the Court or any of the opinions specifically? EXPLAIN

Overall, what do you think of the importance of the case and the opinion?

*these are the most important parts

A paper receiving a 75% or higher will do the above, but do so in a more articulate, thoughtful, and grammatically correct way. The assignment is an essay, NOT a question and answer worksheet.
POSC 170: Court case list for assignment #3

I Amendment: Religious Establishment Clause I Amendment: Religious Free Exercise Clause

Everson v. Board of Education (1947) Reynolds v. United States (1879)

Engle v. Vital (1962) Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)

School District of Abington Township v. Schempp Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Employment Division v. Smith (1990)

Doe v. Duncanville (1996) Church of Lukumi v. City of Hialeah (1993)

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)

Van Orden v. Perry (2005)

I Amendment: Speech

Schenck v. United States (1919)

Tinker v Des Moines Community School District (1969)

Miller v. California (1973)

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

Morse v. Frederick (2007)

II Amendment: Arming Bears

District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)

McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010)

IV Amendment: Search and Seizure

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

Maryland v. Garrison (1987)

Nix v. Williams (1984)

Carroll v. U.S. (1925)

California v. Carney (1985)

Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995)

Arizona v. Gant (2009)

Stafford Unified School District #1 v. Redding (2009)

V Amendment: Self-Incrimination

Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Missouri v. Seibert (2004)

VI Amendment: Counsel and Witnesses

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Maryland v. Craig (1990)

VII Amendment: Juries

Williams v. Florida (1970)

VIII Amendment: Death Penalty

Furman v. Georgia (1972)

Atkins v. Virginia (2002)

Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)

Roper v. Simmons (2005)

Baze and Bolling v. Rees (2008)

Here are a couple case search sites

1. Cornell University – Legal Information Institute. Scroll down and you will find their archive link.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/home (Links to an external site.)

2. IIT Chicago-Kent Oyez Project

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015 (Links to an external site.)

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

How does Dr. Carey define leadership

1. How does Dr. Carey define leadership?

2. Draw and label Blake & Mouton’s Managerial Grid. Label where you were when you started MGMT 4010 with an “S” and where you were when the course ended with an “E”.

What influenced you to move from the start of the course to where you were at the end of the course?

3. What’s more important, task or people?

Circle only one: TASK PEOPLE

And explain why:

4. Describe your task (goal) orientation:

5. Describe your people orientation:

6. How did you motivate your associates: intrinsically and extrinsically?

Which is best, why?

7. What do you recommend to improve the MGMT 4010 class and/or the project team experience?

11.

THE FEDERAL COURTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES
Assignment #3: THE FEDERAL COURTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES
I. Options

For this assignment you may examine any Supreme Court decision concerning one of the first ten amendments. You may use a case on the provided list of cases below or you may also find your own case. However, it is a very good idea to check the case with the Instructor before beginning if the case was not on the provided list. Many cases sound like they are relevant to the first ten amendments, but are not actually decided on these topics.
II. Task:

Court Decision: You may use any case search site or general search site (a couple case search sites are available on the Canvas site with the assignment). You must find any case that deals with one of the first ten amendments. You should look at both recent cases and older cases. Some of the older cases are more interesting as they argue positions that have been overturned since then and you can see the different way the same issue may be interpreted by different courts. Most cases may be found by searching by topic or the amendment number; for example, “first amendment Supreme Court cases,” or “search and seizure Supreme Court cases.” Most case search sites will find the case by listing a party in the case. For example, the case Miranda v. Arizona may be found by typing “Miranda” into the search. Please ask for help if you have any difficulty.
III. Requirements:

Court Decision: Select any Supreme Court Case concerning one of the first ten amendments. Write a 3-5 page essay-styled paper discussing the case and the Court’s opinion. The paper must be double-spaced, 10-12 font, and 1-inch margins. AVOID CUTTING AND PASTING AT ALL COSTS. The paper must be in your words and NOT a copy of the Court decision. At a minimum, a paper receiving a 70% MUST fulfill format requirements and address the following questions:

What is the case and the relevant amendment?

*What are the background details of the case (who, what, where … info)?

*What did the Court decide, WHY, and who wrote the opinions?

Were there any concurring or dissenting opinions and who wrote them?

Do you agree with the Court or any of the opinions specifically? EXPLAIN

Overall, what do you think of the importance of the case and the opinion?

*these are the most important parts

A paper receiving a 75% or higher will do the above, but do so in a more articulate, thoughtful, and grammatically correct way. The assignment is an essay, NOT a question and answer worksheet.
POSC 170: Court case list for assignment #3

I Amendment: Religious Establishment Clause I Amendment: Religious Free Exercise Clause

Everson v. Board of Education (1947) Reynolds v. United States (1879)

Engle v. Vital (1962) Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)

School District of Abington Township v. Schempp Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Employment Division v. Smith (1990)

Doe v. Duncanville (1996) Church of Lukumi v. City of Hialeah (1993)

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)

Van Orden v. Perry (2005)

I Amendment: Speech

Schenck v. United States (1919)

Tinker v Des Moines Community School District (1969)

Miller v. California (1973)

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

Morse v. Frederick (2007)

II Amendment: Arming Bears

District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)

McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010)

IV Amendment: Search and Seizure

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

Maryland v. Garrison (1987)

Nix v. Williams (1984)

Carroll v. U.S. (1925)

California v. Carney (1985)

Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995)

Arizona v. Gant (2009)

Stafford Unified School District #1 v. Redding (2009)

V Amendment: Self-Incrimination

Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Missouri v. Seibert (2004)

VI Amendment: Counsel and Witnesses

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Maryland v. Craig (1990)

VII Amendment: Juries

Williams v. Florida (1970)

VIII Amendment: Death Penalty

Furman v. Georgia (1972)

Atkins v. Virginia (2002)

Stanford v. Kentucky (1989)

Roper v. Simmons (2005)

Baze and Bolling v. Rees (2008)

Here are a couple case search sites

1. Cornell University – Legal Information Institute. Scroll down and you will find their archive link.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/home (Links to an external site.)

2. IIT Chicago-Kent Oyez Project

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015 (Links to an external site.)

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes